That natural reality is assumed rather than explained is not proof for the existence of a creator. Introducing god as an explanatory notion only shifts the locus of the question: why would such a god exist? And, it is possible that the universe just happens to exist, without explanation.


In: Victor J. Stenger, Has Science Found God?: The Latest Results in the Search for Purpose, in the Universe, Chapter Seven (p. 163)

Willem B. Drees Quotes

That natural reality is assumed rather than explained is not proof for the existence of a creator. Introducing god as an explanatory notion only...

That natural reality is assumed rather than explained is not proof for the existence of a creator. Introducing god as an explanatory notion only...

That natural reality is assumed rather than explained is not proof for the existence of a creator. Introducing god as an explanatory notion only...

That natural reality is assumed rather than explained is not proof for the existence of a creator. Introducing god as an explanatory notion only...