I think that one who appreciates the fact that, if there are to be genuine causal connections, they must amount to conceptual connections, is Hume. Hume, of course, denies that there are conceptual connections among distinct things and so he is unable to come up with genuine cases of causation. But, in a way, Hume does accept the rationalist demand that, if there is to be genuine causation, it must amount to conceptual connection. Spinoza accepts this rationalist demand too. But, unlike Hume, he sees there as being genuine conceptual connections, i. e. causal connections, in the world.


Spinoza (2008) - Two: The Metaphysics of Substance


I think that one who appreciates the fact that, if there are to be genuine causal connections, they must amount to conceptual connections, is Hume....

I think that one who appreciates the fact that, if there are to be genuine causal connections, they must amount to conceptual connections, is Hume....

I think that one who appreciates the fact that, if there are to be genuine causal connections, they must amount to conceptual connections, is Hume....

I think that one who appreciates the fact that, if there are to be genuine causal connections, they must amount to conceptual connections, is Hume....