Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The inability to deter a potential attacker, the immediacy of today's threats, and the magnitude of potential harm that could be caused by our adversaries' choice of weapons, do not permit that option. We cannot let our enemies strike first.


From the document The National Security Strategy of the United States of America, (June 1, 2002)


Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The...

Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The...

Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The...

Given the goals of rogue states and terrorists, the United States can no longer solely rely on a reactive posture as we have in the past. The...