Curtis LeMay Quote

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first use of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima. The fact that it's done instantaneously, maybe that's more humane than incendiary attacks, if you can call any war act humane. I don't, particularly, so to me there wasn't much difference. A weapon is a weapon and it really doesn't make much difference how you kill a man. If you have to kill him, well, that's the evil to start with and how you do it becomes pretty secondary. I think your choice should be which weapon is the most efficient and most likely to get the whole mess over with as early as possible.


The World at War: the Landmark Oral History from the Classic TV Series, p. 574

Picture Quote 1

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first...

Picture Quote 2

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first...

Picture Quote 3

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first...

Picture Quote 4

As far as casualties were concerned I think there were more casualties in the first attack on Tokyo with incendiaries than there were with the first...