Political scientists have long relied on organization theory as their foundation for understanding public bureaucracy. This approach makes good sense, but so far the payoffs have been rather limited. The surface problem is that organization theory, as the creature of sociologists, social psychologists, and, in more recent years, economists, has developed around explanatory concerns having little or nothing to do with government. The more fundamental problem is that political scientists have allowed this to happen by largely abandoning the field of organizations.


Terry M. Moe, "Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy." Oliver E. Williamson ed. Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond (1995): 116.


Political scientists have long relied on organization theory as their foundation for understanding public bureaucracy. This approach makes good...

Political scientists have long relied on organization theory as their foundation for understanding public bureaucracy. This approach makes good...

Political scientists have long relied on organization theory as their foundation for understanding public bureaucracy. This approach makes good...

Political scientists have long relied on organization theory as their foundation for understanding public bureaucracy. This approach makes good...