Because the fluctuations in the composition of the deck as it is dependent over successive (and dependent) trials, it is intuitively apparent that altering decisions or the magnitude of the wager or both in accordance with the fluctuations should prove advantageous to the player.


Chapter Seven, Blackjack, p. 231 - The Theory of Gambling and Statistical Logic (Revised Edition) 1977


Because the fluctuations in the composition of the deck as it is dependent over successive (and dependent) trials, it is intuitively apparent that...

Because the fluctuations in the composition of the deck as it is dependent over successive (and dependent) trials, it is intuitively apparent that...

Because the fluctuations in the composition of the deck as it is dependent over successive (and dependent) trials, it is intuitively apparent that...

Because the fluctuations in the composition of the deck as it is dependent over successive (and dependent) trials, it is intuitively apparent that...