It bears repetition that an argument against representation is not anti-scientific at all. It is merely an argument against a particular scientific strategy that assumes complexity can be reduced to specific features and then represented in a machine. Instead it is an argument for the appreciation of the nature of complexity, something that can perhaps be 'repeated' in a machine, should the machine itself be complex enough to cope with the distributed character of complexity.


p. 86 - Complexity and Postmodernism (1998)


It bears repetition that an argument against representation is not anti-scientific at all. It is merely an argument against a particular scientific...

It bears repetition that an argument against representation is not anti-scientific at all. It is merely an argument against a particular scientific...

It bears repetition that an argument against representation is not anti-scientific at all. It is merely an argument against a particular scientific...

It bears repetition that an argument against representation is not anti-scientific at all. It is merely an argument against a particular scientific...