But I don't need a Sillygism, you know, to prove that mathematical axiom you mentioned.


Silvie and Bruno, Chapter XVIII (p. 259), Macmillan & Co Ltd. 1890


But I don't need a Sillygism, you know, to prove that mathematical axiom you mentioned.

But I don't need a Sillygism, you know, to prove that mathematical axiom you mentioned.

But I don't need a Sillygism, you know, to prove that mathematical axiom you mentioned.

But I don't need a Sillygism, you know, to prove that mathematical axiom you mentioned.