How can historicism consistently exempt itself from its own verdict that all human thought is historical?


p. 6 - Leo Strauss and Nietzsche (1996)


How can historicism consistently exempt itself from its own verdict that all human thought is historical?

How can historicism consistently exempt itself from its own verdict that all human thought is historical?

How can historicism consistently exempt itself from its own verdict that all human thought is historical?

How can historicism consistently exempt itself from its own verdict that all human thought is historical?