If the stroke of the brush is so important, it is because it expresses precisely what is not there.


('CF, p. 44); as quoted in Karel Appel, a gesture of colour, eds. by Jean-François Lyotard, Christine Buci-Glucksmann, Herman Parret, Leuven University Press, 2009, p. 69 - from 'Karel Appel, a gesture of colour' (2009)


If the stroke of the brush is so important, it is because it expresses precisely what is not there.

If the stroke of the brush is so important, it is because it expresses precisely what is not there.

If the stroke of the brush is so important, it is because it expresses precisely what is not there.

If the stroke of the brush is so important, it is because it expresses precisely what is not there.