The distinction between micro- and macroinventions is useful because, as historians of technology emphasize, the word first is hazardous in this literature.. Many technological breakthroughs had a history that began before the event generally regarded as the invention, and almost all macroinventions required subsequent improvements to make them operational. Yet in a large number of cases, one or two identifiable events were crucial. Without such breakthroughs technological progress would eventually fizzle out.


p. 14 - The lever of riches: Technological creativity and economic progress, 1992


The distinction between micro- and macroinventions is useful because, as historians of technology emphasize, the word first is hazardous in this...

The distinction between micro- and macroinventions is useful because, as historians of technology emphasize, the word first is hazardous in this...

The distinction between micro- and macroinventions is useful because, as historians of technology emphasize, the word first is hazardous in this...

The distinction between micro- and macroinventions is useful because, as historians of technology emphasize, the word first is hazardous in this...