In the end, religious investigations of truth, unlike those of science, are deeply dependent on confirmation bias. You start with what you were taught to believe, or what you want to believe, and then accept only those facts that support your prejudices. This is the basis for the theological practice of apologetics, designed to defend religion against counterarguments and disconfirming evidence.... In contrast, science has no apologetics, for we test our conclusions by trying to find counterevidence.


pp. 66-67 - Faith vs. Fact (2015)


In the end, religious investigations of truth, unlike those of science, are deeply dependent on confirmation bias. You start with what you were...

In the end, religious investigations of truth, unlike those of science, are deeply dependent on confirmation bias. You start with what you were...

In the end, religious investigations of truth, unlike those of science, are deeply dependent on confirmation bias. You start with what you were...

In the end, religious investigations of truth, unlike those of science, are deeply dependent on confirmation bias. You start with what you were...