Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so?


Resolutions of Virginia and Kentucky (ed. 1835)


Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so?

Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so?

Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so?

Can it be of less consequence that the meaning of a Constitution should be fixed and known, than a meaning of a law should be so?