I argued that the chastity of women was of much more consequence than that of men, as the property and rights of families depend upon it.


Boswell: the ominous years, 1774-1776 (ed. 1963)


I argued that the chastity of women was of much more consequence than that of men, as the property and rights of families depend upon it.

I argued that the chastity of women was of much more consequence than that of men, as the property and rights of families depend upon it.

I argued that the chastity of women was of much more consequence than that of men, as the property and rights of families depend upon it.

I argued that the chastity of women was of much more consequence than that of men, as the property and rights of families depend upon it.