If we say that I only get at the symptoms of his anger, that carries an important implication. But is this the way we do talk?


p. 107. - Philosophical Papers (1979)


If we say that I only get at the symptoms of his anger, that carries an important implication. But is this the way we do talk?

If we say that I only get at the symptoms of his anger, that carries an important implication. But is this the way we do talk?

If we say that I only get at the symptoms of his anger, that carries an important implication. But is this the way we do talk?

If we say that I only get at the symptoms of his anger, that carries an important implication. But is this the way we do talk?