To conclude: there are two well-known minor ways in which language has mattered to philosophy. On the one hand there is a belief that if only we produce good definitions, often marking out different senses of words that are confused in common speech, we will avoid the conceptual traps that ensnared our forefathers. On the other hand is a belief that if only we attend sufficiently closely to our mother tongue and make explicit the distinctions there implicit, we shall avoid the conceptual traps. One or the other of these curiously contrary beliefs may nowadays be most often thought of as an answer to the question Why does language matter to philosophy? Neither seems to me enough.


Why Does Language Matter to Philosophy?, 1975, p. 7.


To conclude: there are two well-known minor ways in which language has mattered to philosophy. On the one hand there is a belief that if only we...

To conclude: there are two well-known minor ways in which language has mattered to philosophy. On the one hand there is a belief that if only we...

To conclude: there are two well-known minor ways in which language has mattered to philosophy. On the one hand there is a belief that if only we...

To conclude: there are two well-known minor ways in which language has mattered to philosophy. On the one hand there is a belief that if only we...