Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically, tautologically equal, and within the same discourse, treating their equality as a condition which may, or not, be fulfilled


G. L. S. Shackle (1989) "What did the General Theory do?", in J. Pheby (ed), New Directions in Post-keynesian Economics, Aldershot: Edward Elgar.


Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically,...

Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically,...

Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically,...

Myrdalian ex ante language would have saved the General Theory from describing the flow of investment and the flow of saving as identically,...