If time is treated in modern physics as a dimension on a par with the dimensions of space, why should we a priori exclude the possibility that we are pulled as well as pushed along its axis? The future has, after all, as much or as little reality as the past, and there is nothing logically inconceivable in introducing, as a working hypothesis, an element of finality, supplementary to the element of causality, into our equations. It betrays a great lack of imagination to believe that the concept of "purpose" must necessarily be associated with some anthropomorphic deity.


Epilogue - The Sleepwalkers: A History of Man's Changing Vision of the Universe (1959)


If time is treated in modern physics as a dimension on a par with the dimensions of space, why should we a priori exclude the possibility that we are ...

If time is treated in modern physics as a dimension on a par with the dimensions of space, why should we a priori exclude the possibility that we are ...

If time is treated in modern physics as a dimension on a par with the dimensions of space, why should we a priori exclude the possibility that we are ...

If time is treated in modern physics as a dimension on a par with the dimensions of space, why should we a priori exclude the possibility that we are ...